Get In Touch
[email protected]
Work Inquiries
[email protected]
Back

Security and Law

Should any attempts to engage in dialogue with terrorist organizations be criminalized?

Criminalizing any dialogue with terrorist organizations ensures a firm stance against legitimizing their actions, preserving national security and the rule of law. Engaging in talks…

More aggressive and exclusionary methods are needed for activism to achieve its goals

Aggressive and exclusionary methods can amplify the urgency of an activist cause, drawing attention from those in power who might otherwise ignore softer tactics. History…

This website stores cookies on your computer. Cookie Policy

Should any attempts to engage in dialogue with terrorist organizations be criminalized?

Criminalizing any dialogue with terrorist organizations ensures a firm stance against legitimizing their actions, preserving national security and the rule of law. Engaging in…

  • Affirmative

    National security, Legitimacy.

  • Opposition

    Conflict resolution, Peacebuilding.

  • Tags

    Security and Law

View Project

More aggressive and exclusionary methods are needed for activism to achieve its goals

Aggressive and exclusionary methods can amplify the urgency of an activist cause, drawing attention from those in power who might otherwise ignore softer tactics.…

  • Affirmative

    Impact, Mobilization

  • Opposition

    Polarization, Backlash

  • Tags

    Security and Law

View Project